From 4691a4a1e4392d625057a9108e5a9989d6d146a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Walden Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:52:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Adjust a comment discussing transferred ArrayBuffers to refer to those buffers being detached, not neutered. This change makes the comment consistent with terminology used in the ECMAScript specification. --- src/core/image.js | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/core/image.js b/src/core/image.js index 7688ed5dc..6329f9d40 100644 --- a/src/core/image.js +++ b/src/core/image.js @@ -573,10 +573,10 @@ var PDFImage = (function PDFImageClosure() { imgArray = this.getImageBytes(originalHeight * rowBytes); // If imgArray came from a DecodeStream, we're safe to transfer it - // (and thus neuter it) because it will constitute the entire - // DecodeStream's data. But if it came from a Stream, we need to - // copy it because it'll only be a portion of the Stream's data, and - // the rest will be read later on. + // (and thus detach its underlying buffer) because it will constitute + // the entire DecodeStream's data. But if it came from a Stream, we + // need to copy it because it'll only be a portion of the Stream's + // data, and the rest will be read later on. if (this.image instanceof DecodeStream) { imgData.data = imgArray; } else {