Moreover, rename `FindStates` to `FindState` since enumeration names are
usually not in plural, for readability and consistency with the ones in
`src/shared/util.js`.
This patch intends to simplify future ES6 refactoring of the thumbnail code, since the current code isn't going to work well together with proper `Class`es.
With the current way that the `HandTool` is implemented, if someone would try to also add a Zoom tool (as issue 1260 asks for) that probably wouldn't work very well given that you'd then have two cursor tools which may not play nice together.
Hence this patch, which attempts to refactor things so that it should be simpler to add e.g. a Zoom tool as well (given that that issue is marked as "good-beginner-bug", and I'm not sure if that really applies considering the current state of the code).
Note that I personally have no interest in implementing a Zoom tool (similar to Adobe Reader) since I wouldn't use it, but I figured that it can't hurt to make this code a bit more future proof.
PR 7341 added special handling for `nameddest`s that look like pageNumbers, to prevent issues since we previously *incorrectly* supported specifying a pageNumber directly in the hash; i.e. `#10` versus the correct `#page=10` format.
Since this behaviour wasn't correct, PR 7757 fixed and deprecated the old format, which means that we no longer need to maintain the `nameddest` hack in multiple files.
This patch replaces a `var self = this;` statement with arrow functions, and `var` with `let` in `PDFLinkService.navigateTo`.
Furthermore, when I started looking at this method, it quickly became clear that its code is somewhat of a mess. Since I'm one of the persons that have touched this code over the years, I figured that it'd be a good idea to try and clean it up a bit.
Also replaces `var` with `let` in code that's touched in the patch. Please note that this should be completely safe, for two separate reasons, since trying to access let in a scope where it's not defined is first of all a runtime error and second of all an ESLint error (thanks to the `no-undef` rule).
Currently this method first uses a loop to build a temporary array to hold Promises, which are then resolved from a recursive helper function once the textContent is fetched for each page.
To me, this is unncessarily complicated, since we can do everything within one loop by simply chaining the asynchronous calls to retrieve the textContent. (Note that this guarantees that the textContent of the pages is still fetched sequentially.)
Also replaces `var` with `let` in the functions/methods that are touched in the patch. Please note that this should be completely safe, for two separate reasons, since trying to access `let` in a scope where it's not defined is first of all a runtime error and second of all an ESLint error (thanks to the `no-undef` rule).
This patch contains the following improvements:
- Only fetch the various document properties *once* per PDF file opened, and cache the result (in a frozen object).
- Always update the *entire* dialog at once, to prevent inconsistent UI state (issue 8371).
- Ensure that the dialog, and all its internal properties, are reset when `PDFViewerApplication.close` is called.
- Inline, and re-factor, the `getProperties` method in `open`, since that's the only call-site.
- Always overwrite the fileSize with the value obtained from `pdfDocument.getDownloadInfo`, to ensure that it's correct.
- ES6-ify the code that's touched in this patch.
Fixes 8371.
Please see http://eslint.org/docs/rules/object-shorthand.
For the most part, these changes are of the search-and-replace kind, and the previously enabled `no-undef` rule should complement the tests in helping ensure that no stupid errors crept into to the patch.
Rather than having to manually use `initializedPromise`, which really ought to be a private property, to ensure that setting/getting values in the `ViewHistory` works as intended, this re-factoring simply changes all of its methods to be asynchronous.
Furthermore, a `getMultiple` method (mirroring the existing `setMultiple` one) is also added to `ViewHistory`.
Finally, this patch also addresses an existing issue, where certain preferences (e.g. the default zoom level) would be ignored when calling `setInitialView` if reading from the `ViewHistory` fails for some reason.
With the exception of just one test-case, all the current `ui_utils` unit-tests can run successfully on Node.js (since most of them doesn't rely on the DOM).
To get this working, I had to first of all add a new `LIB` build flag such that `gulp lib` produces a `web/pdfjs.js` file that is able to load `pdf.js` successfully.
Second of all, since neither `document` nor `navigator` is available in Node.js, `web/ui_utils.js` was adjusted slightly to avoid errors.
This prevents issues with the filename detection being skipped, when trying to download the opened PDF attachment, since `getPDFFileNameFromURL` ignores `data:` URLs for performance reasons.
The patch also changes the `defaultFilename` to use the ES6 default parameter notation, and fixes the formatting of the JSDoc comment.
Finally, since `getPDFFileNameFromURL` currently has no unit-tests, a few basic ones are added to avoid regressions.
In the first commit in PR 8203, I changed how the `DownloadManager` was included/initialized in `GENERIC`/`CHROME` builds.
The change was prompted by the fact that you cannot have conditional `import`s with ES6 modules, and I wanted to avoid bundling the general `DownloadManager` into the various Firefox specific build targets.
What I completely missed though, is that the new code meant that `download_manager.js` will now be pulling in the *entire* viewer (through `app.js`).
This is a *really* stupid mistake on my part, since it causes the `dist/build/pdf_viewer.js` used with the viewer components to now include basically the entire default viewer.
The simplest solution that I could come up with, is to add a `genericcom.js` file (similar to the `firefoxcom.js`/`chromecom.js` files) which will be responsible for importing/initializing the `DownloadManager`.
The browsers have become smarter and made this hack no longer
functional. Since this is now enforced by practically all browsers,
there is nothing more we can do about this. It is up to the user to
serve the viewer over HTTPS or deal with the warning.
Note that this is in no way specific for PDF.js. Any site with password
inputs served over HTTP has this problem right now. This hack was
provided as a convenience for the users, but nothing more than that.
Since calling `PDFPageView.setPdfPage` will in turn call `PDFPageView.reset`, which cancels all rendering and completely resets the page, it's thus possible that we currently cause some unnecessary re-rendering during the initial loading phase of the viewer.
Depending on the order in which data arrives, it's possible (and in practice always seem to happen) that the `pdfPage` property of the *second* page has already been set during `PDFViewer.setDocument`, by the time that the request for the `pdfPage` is resolved in `PDFViewer._ensurePdfPageLoaded`.
Also, note how the `setPdfPage` call in `PDFViewer.setDocument` is already guarded by this kind of check.
In various viewer files, there's a number of cases where we basically duplicate the functionality of `createPromiseCapability` manually.
As far as I can tell, a couple of these cases have existed for a very long time, and notable even before the `createPromiseCapability` utility function existed.
Also, since we can write ES6 code now, the patch also replaces a couple of `bind` usages with arrow functions in code that's touched in the patch.
This patch implements support for line annotations. Other viewers only
show the popup annotation when hovering over the line, which may have
any orientation. To make this possible, we render an invisible line (SVG
element) over the line on the canvas that acts as the trigger for the
popup annotation. This invisible line has the same starting coordinates,
ending coordinates and width of the line on the canvas.
Note that as discussed on IRC, this makes the viewer slightly slower to load *only* in `gulp server` mode, however the difference seem slight enough that I think it will be fine.
Tim van der Meij
Jonas Jenwald
Yury Delendik